U.S. President Trump faces a critical decision on Iran as violent protests continue, with military action, cyber measures, and diplomacy all on the table, while the regime’s crackdown and regional risks complicate any response.
Nepal Verified News
Tue Jan 13 2026

With violent protests unfolding across Iran, U.S. President Donald Trump is under pressure to decide how to respond. Ten days ago, he said the U.S. was “locked and loaded” to protect Iranian protesters if the government used force. Now, with reports of mass casualties and arrests, the stakes have escalated, BBC reported.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “Nobody knows what President Trump is going to do except for President Trump,” as senior officials prepare to brief him on potential options. Trump himself has hinted at “very strong options,” signaling both diplomatic and possible military measures.
Analysts say Washington is likely focused on influencing the Iranian regime’s behavior rather than pursuing full regime change, given the high risks involved. Options include targeted strikes, cyber operations, and covert campaigns designed to disrupt the Iranian command structure.
However, experts warn military action could backfire by strengthening the regime and rallying popular support. “A U.S. strike could embolden protesters, but it might also unify the regime’s supporters,” said Bilal Saab of Chatham House.
Diplomacy remains a primary path, with Trump revealing that Iranian leaders have privately reached out for talks, likely regarding nuclear negotiations. Some senior aides, including Vice President JD Vance, are urging a diplomatic approach first.
Meanwhile, voices like exiled Iranian royal Reza Pahlavi advocate swift intervention to prevent further bloodshed and push for regime collapse. Yet U.S. officials acknowledge any action carries major risks, including retaliation by Iran’s military and regional allies, which still have significant capabilities.
As the crackdown continues, Trump must weigh whether to act militarily, pursue diplomacy, or risk the ongoing violence continuing unchecked.
No comments yet









