Press Council Nepal Takes Historic Action: Himalayan Times Blacklisted For False Reporting On Famous Mountaineer Nirmal Purja

In a groundbreaking decision, the Press Council of Nepal has officially blacklisted The Himalayan Times following a year-long investigation into a biased and misleading article about renowned mountaineer Nims Purja. On Friday, Press Council Nepal released a written statement announcing the blacklisting of The Himalayan Times daily and its website.  This action comes after Forza, the guiding company owned by Purja, lodged a formal complaint against the publication, which had published 17 articles containing unfounded allegations.

The investigation, prompted by the claims made in The Himalayan Times, revealed a pattern of misinformation that misrepresented Purja's achievements and his guiding company's reputation. The Press Council's ruling marks a significant moment in Nepal's media landscape, sending a clear message about the importance of responsible journalism.

In a meeting held on October 4, 2024, the Press Council recognized the need for further investigation. A task force was formed to conduct a mandatory review, which culminated in a report presented on February 20, 2025. The report categorically stated that the articles were published unilaterally and imbalanced, aimed at creating hatred and discrimination, and potentially causing damage to individuals. The task force recommended legal action against The Himalayan Times for breaching provisions under Section 4(3)(1), 4(6)(1), and 5(2) of the Journalist Code of Conduct, 2073 BS (2016 AD) as amended.

As a result of these findings, the Press Council has decided to charge The Himalayan Times Daily and thehimalayantimes.com, maintaining a record of their disobedience and blacklisting them. Furthermore, the council has inquired why the publication should not be isolated from government advertising funds and welfare advertisements, warning that further action could follow if clarifications are not submitted within three days.

This decision is especially encouraging for the people of Nepal, who have often witnessed manipulation and sensationalism in media reporting. The blacklisting of The Himalayan Times is a beacon of hope, signaling that accountability is possible in the face of wrongdoing. As this is the first time in history that the Press Council has taken such decisive action against a national media outlet, it reflects a commitment to upholding journalistic integrity.

As a result of the blacklisting, The Himalayan Times will no longer be eligible for government funding for marketing and advertising, which they previously relied on. The council has demanded a formal explanation from the publication regarding the reasons why they should continue to receive such support.

This landmark ruling not only holds The Himalayan Times accountable for its actions but also sets a precedent for media practices in Nepal. It serves as a reminder that responsible reporting is crucial for maintaining public trust.

In light of this significant achievement, many hope that this will encourage other media outlets to prioritize accuracy and fairness in their reporting. The consequences faced by The Himalayan Times highlight the necessity for accountability in journalism, paving the way for a more truthful and reliable media environment in Nepal.